Analisis Customer Preference dalam Memilih Hijab (Studi pada Produk Hijab Rumah Anita Jombang)
Abstract
This research aims to identify variations or combinations of attributes that form customer preference for hijab in Jombang district. The method used is a descriptive-exploratory method. Data analysis uses conjoint analysis. The attribute factors that form customer preferences analyzed in this research are materials, colors, models and motifs. Sampling used accidental sampling technique, with a total of 100 respondents. The results show that the product combinations in hijab products of Rumah Anita that are consumer preferences are ceruty chiffon hijab material, soft hijab colors, pashmina hijab models and plain hijab motifs. In choosing Rumah Anita’s hijab products, the order of the most important attributes that influence consumer purchasing decisions is that the first is that consumers prioritize the model attribute, the second is the motif attribute, the third is the material attribute and the last is the color attribute.
References
Abdelhadi, E. (2019). The hijab and Muslim women’s employment in the United States. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 61(January), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2019.01.006.
Adelsi, N., & Normaladewi, A. (2023). Preferensi mahasiswi dalam memilih hijab. E–Jurnal Riset Manajemen, 12(01), 839–846. http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jrm.
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195.
Alatas, M. Y., Mursalin, M., Andriasnyah, A., Prasetyo, A., Hardianto, D., Dewi, R. M. (2018). Sikap dan persepsi konsumen terhadap merek jilbab Syafirah Muslimah di Tangerang Selatan: Pendekatan semantic differential. IJEA Indonesian Journal of Economics Application, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.32546/ijea.v1i1.161.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–657. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2489765.
Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43–50. https://www.proquest.com/openview/968e6436885222038106d874c370feaa/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=9497.
Belmonte, Z. J. A., Prasetyo, Y. T., Ong, A. K. S., Chuenyindee, T., Yuduang, N., Kusonwattana, P., Nadlifatin, R., Persada, S. F., & Buaphiban, T. (2022). How important is the tuition fee during the COVID-19 pandemic in a developing country? Evaluation of filipinos’ preferences on public university attributes using conjoint analysis. Heliyon, 8(11), e11205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11205.
Bosnjak, M., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 352–356. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107.
Brunsø, K., Scholderer, J., & Grunert, K. G. (2004). Closing the gap between values and behavior - A means-end theory of lifestyle. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 665–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00310-7.
Cleofas, M. A., Prasetyo, Y. T., Ong, A. K. S., & Persada, S. F. (2022). Brand or clothing function? Consumer preference analysis on clothing apparel attributes and design: A conjoint analysis approach. WCSE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications, 9, 978–981. https://doi.org/10.18178/wcse.2022.04.146.
Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1429–1464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x.
Deb, M. (2012). Evaluation of customer’s mall preferences in India using fuzzy AHP approach. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 9(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/09727981211225635.
Di Vita, G., Zanchini, R., Spina, D., Vastola, A., D’Amico, M., & Caracciolo, F. (2024). Simply red? The effects of distinct colours and sustainable production methods on the consumers’ preferences for healthier sweet peppers. Heliyon, 10(8), e28661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28661.
Dorf, R. C. (1998). Conjoint analysis methods and applications. CRC Press.
Egeten, A. E. J., Prabowo, H., Gaol, F. L., & Meyliana. (2020). Features preference using conjoint analysis method for e-marketplace social care system. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, 5(6), 1593–1597. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj0506190.
Erdem, O., Ben Oumlil, A., & Tuncalp, S. (1999). Consumer values and the importance of store attributes. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(4), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590559910268435.
Fernandes, S., Venkatesh, V. G., Panda, R., & Shi, Y. (2021). Journal of retailing and consumer services measurement of factors influencing online shopper buying decisions: A scale development and validation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59(November 2020), 102394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102394.
Fikry, A., Ahmad, & Rozi, M. (2019). Malaysian’s young consumer preferences of hijab. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8, 916–924. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.78.
García-Gallego, J. M., & Chamorro Mera, A. (2017). COO vs ROO: Importance of the origin in customer preferences towards financial entities. International Marketing Review, 34(2), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-03-2015-0069.
Guevarra, A. L. C., Prasetyo, Y. T., Ong, A. K. S., & Mariñas, K. A. (2023). Employees’ preference analysis on lean six sigma program coaching attributes using a conjoint analysis approach. Heliyon, 9(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17846.
Guillet, B. D., & Kucukusta, D. (2016). Spa market segmentation according to customer preference. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(2), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2014-0374.
Gumasing, M. J. J., Ong, A. K. S., & Bare, M. A. D. (2022). User preference analysis of a sustainable workstation design for online classes: A conjoint analysis approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(19), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912346.
Haubl, G., & Trifts, V. (2014). Consumer Decision Making Decision Aids in Online Effects of Shopping The Environments : Interactive. 19(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.1.4.15178.
Holbrook, M. B. (2002). Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research, Routledge Publisher.
Hu, X., Wu, N., & Chen, N. (2021). Young people’s behavioral intentions towards low-carbon travel: Extending the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052327.
Ireland, R., & Liu, A. (2018). Application of data analytics for product design: Sentiment analysis of online product reviews. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 23, 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2018.06.003.
Ismayasari, I., Nugroho, S., & Sunandi, E. (2015). Analisis konjoin preferensi mahasiswa dalam memilih produk smartphone android. Skripsi. Statistika Universitas Bengkulu. https://www.scribd.com/document/495280990/4-Analisis-Konjoin-Preferensi-Mahasiswa-Dalam-Memilih-Produk-Smartphone-Android.
Ivanov, S., Soliman, M., Tuomi, A., Alkathiri, N. A., & Al-Alawi, A. N. (2024). Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the theory of planned behaviour. Technology in Society, 77(December 2023), 102521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102521.
Jannah, I. N., & Kodrat, D. S. (2021). Analysis of the consumer preferences of attributes of Rajini Modest Fashion Products. International Conference on Entrepreneurship (ICOEN), KnE Social Sciences, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i5.8801 Vol. 2021.
Jilani, M. M. A. K., Uddin, M. A., Uddin, M. S., Das, A. K., & Dey, M. (2024). Extending the theory of planned behavior to envisage social distancing behavior in containing the COVID-19 outbreak. Heliyon, 10(4), e26113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26113.
Jinadasa, P., & Gunathilaka, G. (2022). Preferences of job attributes and its determinants: A conjoint analysis. Sri Lankan Journal of Business Economics, 10, 56-76. https://mgt.sjp.ac.lk/bec/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Sri-Lankan-Journal-of-Business-Economics-SLJBE-Vol.-10-2-2021-Nov-Article-04.pdf.
Kabbara, D., & Zucchella, A. (2023). Transnational entrepreneurship, Insights from female entrepreneurs in the modest fashion industry. Journal of International Management, 29(5), 101058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2023.101058.
Karima, R. D., Setiadi, R., & Siswantining, T. (2020). Preference analysis of determining jobs using conjoint analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1442(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1442/1/012040.
Kim, H., & Park, M. (2023). Discovering fashion industry trends in the online news by applying text mining and time series regression analysis. Heliyon, 9(7), e18048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18048.
Koo, D. M., Kim, J. J., & Lee, S. H. (2008). Personal values as underlying motives of shopping online. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(2), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555850810864533.
Kowalska-Pyzalska, A., Michalski, R., Kott, M., Skowrońska-Szmer, A., & Kott, J. (2022). Consumer preferences towards alternative fuel vehicles: Results from the conjoint analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 155, 111776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111776.
Kvalsvik, F. (2022). Understanding the role of situational factors on online grocery shopping among older adults. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68(April), 103009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103009.
Laeheem, K. (2018). Problems in promoting Islamic ethics in adherence to the faith among Thai Muslim youths of Ban Kha Ling, Pattani province. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.004.
Lages, L. F., & Fernandes, J. C. (2005). The SERPVAL scale: A multi-item instrument for measuring service personal values. Journal of Business Research, 58(11 Spec. Iss.), 1562–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.10.001.
Le, T. Q., Kohda, Y., & Huynh, V. N. (2019). Using conjoint analysis to estimate customers’ preferences in the apparel industry. 16th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, ICSSSM 2019, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2019.8887668.
Liu, D., Du, H., Southworth, F., & Ma, S. (2017). The influence of social-psychological factors on the intention to choose low-carbon travel modes in Tianjin, China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 105(August), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.004.
Marmaya, N. H., Zakaria, Z., & Mohd Desa, M. N. (2019). Gen Y consumers’ intention to purchase halal food in Malaysia: a PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(3), 1003–1014. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2018-0136.
Martin, S. (2011). Conjoint analysis model specification and estimation (Issue september). Copenhagen Business School.
Okuyucu, Ş. E., & Işbeceren, M. Ü. (2023). The effect of seating elements in accordance with the for social distance on the shopping mall preferences of customers in the post-pandemic process. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(10), 102149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102149.
Ong, A. K. S., Prasetyo, Y. T., Picazo, K. L., Salvador, K. A., Miraja, B. A., Kurata, Y. B., Chuenyindee, T., Nadlifatin, R., Redi, A. A. N. P., & Young, M. N. (2021). Gym-goers preference analysis of fitness centers during the Covid-19 pandemic: A conjoint analysis approach for business sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(18), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810481.
Priyono, A., & Hidayat, A. (2024). Fostering innovation through learning from digital business ecosystem: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100196.
Pu, Y., & Grossklags, J. (2015). Using conjoint analysis to investigate the value of interdependent privacy in social app adoption scenarios. International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015, 2014(July 2013), 1–20. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2015/proceedings/SecurityIS/12.
Qi, J., Hu, J., & Peng, Y. H. (2020). New design concept evaluation method involving customer preferences based on rough distance to redefined ideal solution. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 147(December 2019), 106677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106677.
Rahmath, S., Chambers, L., & Wakewich, P. (2016). Asserting citizenship: Muslim women’s experiences with the hijab in Canada. Women’s Studies International Forum, 58, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2016.06.001.
Raifman, S., Devost, M. A., Digitale, J. C., Hung, Y., & Meghan, C. (2022). Respondent driven sampling: A sampling method for hard to reach populations and beyond. Current Epidemiology Reports, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-022-00287-8.
Rao, V. R. (2010). Conjoint analysis. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4190-8_4.
Rintamäki, T., Kuusela, H., & Mitronen, L. (2007). Identifying competitive customer value propositions in retailing. Managing Service Quality, 17(6), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520710834975.
Santos-arteaga, F. J., Tavana, M., & Di, D. (2020). A new model for evaluating subjective online ratings with uncertain intervals. Expert Systems With Applications, 139, 112850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112850.
Senyo, P. K., Liu, K., & Effah, J. (2019). Digital business ecosystem: Literature review and a framework for future research. International Journal of Information Management, 47(January), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.002.
Song, Y., Li, G., Li, T., & Li, Y. (2021). A purchase decision support model considering consumer personalization about aspirations and risk attitudes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63(May), 102728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102728.
Sriayudha, Y., & Nifita, A. T. (2018). Analysis of preferences and consumer behavior of batik Jambi. Journal of Business Studies and Management Review (JBSMR), 2, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.22437/jbsmr.v2i1.6458.
Swinyard, W. R. (1998). Shopping mall customer values: The national mall shopper and the list of values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 5(3), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6989(97)00023-4.
Wasilewska, E., & Dudziński, M. (2019). Zastosowanie conjoint analysis w badaniu preferencji konsumentów wina. Ekonomika, 126(126), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.22630/eiogz.2019.126.10.
Widyawati, W., Sitepu, R., & Napitupulu, N. (2014). Penerapan analisis konjoin preferensi mahasiswa terhadap pekerjaan (Studi kasus: Mahasiswa S1 FMIPA USU). Saintia Matematika, 2(2), 189–200. https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/76786.
Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894350.
Yu, S., Wang, L., & Yang, Y. (2023). Analyzing and predicting colour preference of colour palettes. Heliyon, 9(3), e14080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14080.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and systhesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v62.5.1047.1047.
Zhang, J., Lin, P., & Simeone, A. (2022). Information mining of customers preferences for product specifications determination using big sales data. Procedia CIRP, 109(March), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.221.
Zhou, X., & Xu, Y. (2020). Conjoint analysis of consumer preferences for dress design. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 32(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-02-2019-0024.
Zunaidi, R. A., & Dewi, S. (2019). Evaluasi produk sepatu wanita bagi UKM Klastik Footwear menggunakan metode choice based conjoint. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33884/jrsi.v5i1.1399.
Copyright (c) 2025 Indra Kurniawan Indra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
