REAKTULISASI DAN PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PELESTARIAN BARONGSAI SEBAGAI MODAL SOSIAL HARMONI MULTIETNIS DI SURAKARTA

  • Riyadi Riyadi Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Eko Satriya Hermawan Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Musa Pelu Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Guntur Arie Wibowo Universitas Samudra

Abstract

The problem that arises in this research is how to make a pattern in the form of a prototype / model of lion dance so that it is always present not only in annual rituals such as Chinese New Year, but can live throughout the year by optimizing the lion dance for the benefit of rituals, rituals, tourism, entertainment, and sports. sports, considering that most of the players are Javanese so that Javanese and Chinese can blend naturally within the framework of multicultural life, which is achieved by the development of one of the Chinese cultures, especially the performing arts of Barongsai which is expected to be able to improve the economy of the people of Surakarta in the tourism sector (ecotourism). From the problems above, the following questions can be formulated: First, to what extent is the lion dance developed outside the interests of traditional rituals?; Second, to what extent is the appreciation of the public and the government for using the lion dance in various interests?; Third, how to formulate a development model that allows accommodation of the lion dance function as a ritual, tourism, entertainment, and sport, in an integrated manner?; and Fourth, how are stakeholder and stakeholder responses that can be done in FGD and expert judgment. With strong multicultural social stability, various positive impacts in the economic and cultural tourism fields can be formed. In the development of the lion dance performance, it is very important to develop synergistically the integration of Ritual, Tourism, Entertainment, and Sports.

References

Anderson, Benedict dan Audrey Kahin. 1982. Interpreting Indonesian Politics: Thirteen Contribition to the Debate. Ithaca, New York: South Asia Program Cornell University.
Anderson, Benedict. 2002. Imagined Communities (Komunitas-Komunitas Terbayang). Jogjakarta: Insist.
Badrus Sholeh. 2009. Agama, Etnisitas dan Radikalisme: Pluralitas Masyarakat Kota Sala. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Bambang Natur Rahadi, dkk. 1998. Rekaman Lensa Peristiwa Mei 1998 di Solo. Surakarta: Aksara Solo Pos, 1998.
Bambang Purwanto, dkk. 2008. Perpektif Baru Penulisan Sejarah. Jakarta: KITLV Press.
Benet, John Willian. 1976. Adaptation as Social Process in theecological Transition; Cultural Anropology in Human Adaption. New York: Pengamon Press Inc.
Benny G. Setiono. 2003. Tionghoa dalam Pusaran Politik, (Jakarta: Elkasa.
Benny Juwono, ”Etnis China di Surakarta 1890-1927: Tinjauan Sosial Ekonomi,” Lembaran Sejarah, 2 No. 1, Pebruari: 1999. 224
Boomgaard, Peter. 2004. Anak Jajahan Belanda: Sejarah Sosial dan Ekonomi Jawa 1795-1880. Jakarta: Djambatan, KITLV.
Budi Santoso. 1996. Rekayasa Kekuasaan Ekonomi (Indonesia 1800-1950); Siasat Pengusaha Tionghoa.Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Carey, Peter. 1995. Orang Jawa dan Masyarakat Cina (1755-1825). Jakarta: Pustaka Azet.
Chris Verdiansyah. 2007. Jalan Panjang Menjadi WNI: Catatan Pengalaman dan Tinjauan Kritis. Jakarta: Kompas.
Djoko Suryo, “Sejarah sosial Pedesaan Karisedenan Semarang 1830-1900,” dikutip dari Benny Juwono, “Etnis Cina di Surakarta 1890-1927: Tinjauan Sosisl Ekonomi”,
Hani Handoko. 1996. Penguasa Ekonomi dan Siasat Penguasa Tionghoa.Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Hari Mulyadi. 1999. Tionghoa dan Struktur Sosial di Surakarta. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu.
_________. “Sejarah Peranan dan Potensi Masyarakat Etnis Tionghoa di Surakarta,” dalam Kalimatun Sawa’ 2.no. 2 Pebruari: 2004.
Houben, Vincent J.H. 1994. Keraton dan Kompeni Surakarta dan Yogyakarta 1830-1870.Leiden: KITLV Press.
Ida Yulianti. “Mindering di Pedesaan Jawa Pada Masa Awal Abad ke-20 (1901-1930),” Lembaran Sejarah, 2 no.1 Pebruari: 1999.
Jamal Wiwoho, dkk. 2008. “Studi Perekat Sosial pada Etnik Berpotensi Konflik sebagai Upaya Menciptakan
Keharmonisan Lingkungan Sosial Budaya melalui Pendekatan Social Capital di Kampung Balong Surakarta: Studi Kasus Etnis Cina-Jawa,” Laporan Hasil Penelitian Fundamental.Surakarta: UNS.
Kahin, George Mc. Turman. 1996. Refleksi Pergumulan Lahirnya Republik: Nasionalisme dan Revolusi di Indonesia.
Kuntowijoyo. 1995. Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Jogyakarta: Bentang Budaya.
Leo Suryadinata. 1998. Dilema Minoritas Tionghoa. Jakarta: LP3ES.
_________. 1981. Peranakan Chinese Politics in Java 1917-1942. Singapore: Singapore
Mackie, J. A. C, ”Peran Ekonomi dan Identitas Etnis Tionghoa Indonesia dan Muangthai,” dalam Benny Juwono, ”Etnis China di Surakarta 1890-1927: Tinjauan Sosial Ekonomi” Lembaran Sejarah, 2 No. 1, Pebruari: 1999
Markhamah. 2000. Etnis Cina: Kajian Linguistik Kultural. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.
Mely G. Tan. 1981. Golongan Etnis Tionghoa di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.
Mona Lohanda. 2001. The Capitan Cina of Batavia 1837-1942. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Naveront, John K. 1994. Jaringan Masyarakat China.Jakarta: Golden Terayon Press.
Published
2022-10-12
How to Cite
Riyadi, R., Hermawan, E. S., Pelu, M., & Wibowo, G. A. (2022). REAKTULISASI DAN PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PELESTARIAN BARONGSAI SEBAGAI MODAL SOSIAL HARMONI MULTIETNIS DI SURAKARTA. SEUNEUBOK LADA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sejarah, Sosial, Budaya Dan Kependidikan, 9(2), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.33059/jsnbl.v10i2.6361

Most read articles by the same author(s)