Principal Leadership in Supporting Teachers’ Pedagogical Competence Development at SMP Negeri 2 Wolowaru

  • Faisal Hamid Maka Raja Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Basuki Pramono Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Zuhdi Arman Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Azhar Azhar Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Daeng Ayub Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Riau, Indonesia
Keywords: Pedagogical Competence, Instructional Leadership, School Principal, Academic Supervision, Teacher Professional Development

Abstract

Teachers’ pedagogical competence is essential for designing, implementing, and evaluating learning that responds to students’ diverse needs. At SMP Negeri 2 Wolowaru, Ende Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, instructional challenges were identified including the dominance of lecture-based teaching, limited variation in learning media, and the need to strengthen teachers’ competence. This study describes how principal leadership supports teachers’ pedagogical competence development. A qualitative approach with a descriptive design was employed. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, observation, and documentation involving the school principal and teachers as informants. Data analysis followed the reduction, display, and conclusion-drawing procedures of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2014). Trustworthiness was addressed through source and method triangulation. The findings indicate that the principal’s role was expressed through planning teacher-development programs, facilitating training and workshops, encouraging peer mentoring, conducting academic supervision, providing constructive feedback, organizing professional-learning activities, and motivating teachers. Teachers reported that training-needs assessments and follow-up discussions after supervision supported reflection on instructional practice. However, professional-development activities sometimes competed with administrative responsibilities. The study concludes that principal leadership can support pedagogical competence when development is planned, collaborative, and sustained. Schools are recommended to strengthen supervision follow-up and align professional-learning schedules with teachers’ workloads. These findings should be interpreted within the scope of a single-school descriptive case study.

References

Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report

Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. Routledge.

Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. Jossey-Bass.

Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.

Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244793

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699

Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/461445

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2018 tentang Pemenuhan Beban Kerja Guru, Kepala Sekolah, dan Pengawas Sekolah. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/79/permendikbud-no-15-tahun-2018

Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/17922/permendiknas-no-16-tahun-2007

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyasa, E. (2013). Uji kompetensi dan penilaian kinerja guru. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyasa, E. (2019). Menjadi kepala sekolah profesional (edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 results (Volume II): Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en

Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership, Volume 1: Policy and practice. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264044715-en

Republik Indonesia. (2005). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/40266/uu-no-14-tahun-2005

Robinson, V. M. J. (2011). Student-centered leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509

Sagala, S. (2013). Kemampuan profesional guru dan tenaga kependidikan. Alfabeta.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development. International Academy of Education & International Bureau of Education. https://www.iaoed.org/downloads/EdPractices_18.pdf

UNESCO. (2022). Transforming education: A collective endeavour. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381996

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Published
2026-10-22
Section
Articles