JURIDICAL REVIEW ARTICLE 27A OF LAW NUMBER 1 OF 2024 CONCERNING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO LAW NUMBER 11 OF 2008 CONCERNING INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS

Muzakkir; Taufik Hidayat

doi:10.33059/jhsk.v19i2.10650

Muzakkir IAIN LANGSA
Taufik Hidayat Jurusan Syariah, Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Aceh Tamiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v19i2.10650

Keywords: Juridical, Insult, defamation

Abstract

Nowadays, the rapid development of communication through the internet has also led to various crimes committed using the internet media. The purpose of this research is to find out the differences in the offence of insult and/or defamation contained in the Criminal Code and those contained in Law number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE). This research uses normative juridical research methods, namely legal research that prioritises a library approach (library research). That the difference in offence and defamation contained in the Criminal Code and the ITE Law is between defamation or offence contained in Article 310 of the Criminal Code and Article 27A jo. Article 45 paragraph (4) of the ITE Law is that in Article 310 of the Criminal Code, the element of an act that attacks honour or good name is an act that tells or damages the good name or dignity of another person that is done directly by means of oral or written to inform the public, while in the ITE Law, the act of damaging honour or good name is an act that damages or damages the good name or dignity of another person that is done in the form of electronic information and/or electronic documents carried out through an electronic system. The juridical review of Article 27A of the ITE Law is that the act of attacking the honour or good name of another person is carried out in the form of electronic information and/or electronic documents carried out through an electronic system.

References

Angkasa, Nitaria, Yulia Kusuma Wardani, Zulkarnain, Yennie Agustin MR, Ali Faisal, Gunawan, Husni Mubaroq, and Maya Shafira. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Edited by M. Akib, Maroni, and Hamzah. I. Lampung: CV. Laduny Alifatama, 2019.
Aptika, Aptika. “Ahli Hukum Dan Akademisi Nilai Revisi UU ITE Persempit Ruang Multitafsir.” Aptika Kominfo, 2022. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2022/09/ahli-hukum-dan-akademisi-nilai-revisi-uu-ite-persempit-ruang-multitafsir/.
Arviana, Nerissa, Sari Mandiana, and Jusup Jacobus Setyabudhi. “Analisis Kasus Prita Mulyasari Dalam Putusan Peninjiauan Kembali No. 225 Pk/Pid.Sus/2011.” YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 6, no. 2 (2020): 78–81. https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v6i2.47.
Aswari, Aan, Andika Prawira Buana, Farah Syah Rezah, Kanun Jurnal, and Ilmu Hukum. “Harmonisasi Hukum Hak Untuk Dilupakan Bagi Koran Digital Terhadap Calon Mahasiswa Di Makassar.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 20, no. 1 (2018): 39–62. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i1.9656.
Barkatullah, Abdul Halim. Hukum Transaksi Elektronik -Sebagai Panduan Dalam Menghadapi Era Digital Bisnis e-Commerce Di Indonesia. Nusamedia, 2017.
Erika, Boby, Devi Dwi Wahyuni, Firmansyah, Hilmar Sinaga, Ricky Sinaga, and Yoyon M. Darusman. “Analisa Atas Perubahan Undang-Undang Informasi Transaksi Elektronik (ITE).” Jurnal IKAMAKUM 3, no. 1 (2023): 335–46.
Karo, Rizky P.P. Karo. “Analisis Kritis Delik Pencemaran Nama Baik/ Penghinaan (Studi Perbandingan : Indonesia Dan Belanda).” Jurnal Law Pro Justitia Vol. 5, no. 2 (2020): 1–23.
Kurniawan, Yunan Prasetyo, Lisda Syamsumardian, Siti Nurhalizza, Henri Christian Pattinaja, Cipta Indralestari Rachman, Rury Octaviani, and Endra Wijaya. “Penerapan Teori Keadilan Bermartabat Dalam Kasus Korban Pelecehan Seksual Yang Melakukan Pencemaran Nama Di Media Sosial.” In Serina IV Untar 2022 Pemberdayaan Dan Perlindungan Konsumen Di Era Ekonomi Digital, 305–14. Universitas Tarumanegara, 2022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24912/pserina.v2i1.18546.
Leavy, Patricia. Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. New York: The Guilford Press, 2017. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results.
Melani, Arta, Eli Nurhayati, Estri Dwi Astuti, Sastra Indonesia, and Stkip Darussalam Cilacap. “ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE CRIMES IN THE CASE OF " LORD LUHUT " DEFAMATION Linguistik Forensik : Penghinaan Dan Pencemaran Nama Baik Artis Dewi Persik Ole.” Inlit Journal 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–6.
Mintowati, Mintowati. “Pencemaran Nama Baik: Kajian Linguistik Forensik.” Paramasastra 3, no. 2 (2016): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.26740/parama.v3i2.1525.
Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
Purnamasari, Dian Dewi. “Aktivis Haris-Fatia Divonis Bebas Dari Tuduhan Pencemaran Nama Baik Luhut.” kompas.id, 2024. https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2024/01/08/aktivis-haris-fatia-divonis-bebas-dalam-kasus-pencemaran-nama-baik-luhut.
Putra, Han Revand. “Beranda Nasional Haris Azhar Dan Fatia Maulidiyanti Didakwa Langgar UU ITE, Direktur PSHK Desak Hakim Gunakan Interpretasi Futuris.” Tempo, 2023. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1715616/haris-azhar-dan-fatia-maulidiyanti-didakwa-langgar-uu-ite-direktur-pshk-desak-hakim-gunakan-interpretasi-futuristik.
Rifai, Eddy. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Tindak Pidana Pers. Lampung: Program Studi Magister Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung, 2010.
Tami, Nindya Dhisa Permata, and Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. “Studi Komparasi Pengaturan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Perdata Di Indonesia.” Law Reform 9, no. 1 (2013): 106. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v9i1.12437.