DISKREPANSI PRAKTIK HUKUMAN MATI DI INDONESIA TERHADAP STANDAR HAM INTERNASIONAL: ANALISIS REFORMASI KUHP 2023 DAN IMPLIKASINYA BAGI KEBIJAKAN PIDANA NASIONAL

  • Irfan Harmain Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Dian Mustika Intan Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Ilhamda Fattah Kaloko Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Herry Wahyudi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Irman Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v20i1.11360
Keywords: Hukuman mati, ICCPR, KUHP 2023, moratorium, hak asasi manusia

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis ketidaksesuaian praktik hukuman mati di Indonesia, khususnya untuk kejahatan narkotika, dengan standar hukum internasional seperti ICCPR dan General Comment No. 36 Komite HAM PBB. Dengan metode yuridis normatif dan pendekatan interpretatif-komparatif, penelitian mengungkap bahwa Indonesia masih menerapkan hukuman mati untuk kejahatan non-kekerasan, bertentangan dengan prinsip “kejahatan paling serius” dalam hukum internasional. Temuan baru menunjukkan bahwa reformasi KUHP 2023, meski memperkenalkan masa percobaan 10 tahun, belum mengarah pada penghapusan substantif hukuman mati, melainkan hanya modifikasi prosedural. Analisis ini juga mendalami konsekuensi moratorium dan potensi status hukuman mati di masa depan, termasuk implikasi diplomatik dan hambatan ekstradisi. Penelitian menyoroti perlunya harmonisasi kebijakan nasional dengan norma HAM global serta rekomendasi untuk moratorium eksekusi.

References

Budiman, Adhigama Andre, Genoveva Alicia K. S Maya, Girlie L.A Ginting, Iftitah Iftitahsari, Lovina Lovina, Maidina Rahmawati, and Nur Ansar. “Series 2: ICJR Thematic Report on Death Penalty Torture in the Cases of Death Penalty in Indonesia: ‘One Too Many.’” ICJR Series 2, no. Series 2 (2023): 1–55.

Council, Human Rights. “Report of the Working Group on the UPR” 22688, no. December 2018 (2018). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G18/446/65/PDF/G1844665.pdf?OpenElement.

———. “Study on the Impact of the World Drug Problem on the Enjoyment of Human Rights : Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.” United Nations General Assembly, Human Rights Council. Vol. 30, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300012881.

Council, Social. “Advance Unedited Version.” United Nations, no. June (2011): 1–24. https://doi.org/CAT/C/MAR/CO/4.

DAFF. Government Gazette Staatskoerant, Pub. L. No. 18519, Government Gazette (1997). http://www.greengazette.co.za/pages/national-gazette-37230-of-17-january-2014-vol-583_20140117-GGN-37230-003.

Death Penalty Information Center, and Amnesty. “Executions Around the World | Death Penalty Information Center.” Washington, D.C., n.d. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/international/executions-around-the-world.

detikNews. “RUU KUHP: Terpidana Mati Yang Berkelakuan Baik Vonisnya Bisa Diubah RUU KUHP: Terpidana Mati Yang Berkelakuan Baik Vonisnya Bisa Diubah.” detikNews, 2021.

DPR RI. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Pub. L. No. 1, DPR RI (2023).

Hood, Roger, and Carolyn Hoyle. The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective. The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228478.001.0001.

Hukum, Fakultas, and Universitas Udayana. “TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI , SUATU PERBANDINGAN HUKUM INDONESIA DAN CHINA” 14, no. 06 (2025).

Human Rights Committee. “General Comment No. 36 Article 6 Right to Life” 15012, no. November 2018 (2019): (2019) UN Doc CCPR/G/GC/36. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3884724?ln=en.

ICJR. “Penyiksaan Masih Subur: Mulai Dari Proses Peradilan Pidana Sampai Fenomena Deret Tunggu Terpidana Mati,” n.d.

———. “Seri 3 Laporan Tematik Pidana Mati ICJR Analisis Putusan Dan Praktik Eksekusi Orang-Orang Yang Dijatuhi Pidana Mati Di Indonesia: ‘Mengingat Mereka Yang Telah Tereksekusi.’” Jakarta Selatan, 2023.

Institute for Criminal Justice Reform. “ICJR Luncurkan Seri Keempat Laporan Tematik Pidana Mati Tentang Praktik-Praktik Pembelaan Dan Menyerukan DPR RI Dan Pemerintah Untuk Segera Melakukan Perubahan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).” Jakarta: INSTITUTE FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM, 2024. https://icjr.or.id/icjr-luncurkan-seri-keempat-laporan-tematik-pidana-mati-tentang-praktik-praktik-pembelaan-dan-menyerukan-dpr-ri-dan-pemerintah-untuk-segera-melakukan-perubahan-kitab-undang-undang-hukum-acara-pidana/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

———. “Laporan Situasi Kebijakan Pidana Mati Di Indonesia 2023: Pengubahan Pidana Mati Secara Otomatis Mandat KUHP Baru,” 2024.

International, Amnesty. “Death Sentences and Executions 2024.” Amnesty International Ltd. London, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078405004104.

———. “Eksekusi Mati Global Cetak Rekor, Vonis Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia Terus Bertambah : Amnesty International Indonesia.” Amnesty International Ltd, 2025. https://www.amnesty.id/kabar-terbaru/siaran-pers/eksekusi-mati-global-cetak-rekor-vonis-hukuman-mati-di-indonesia-terus-bertambah/04/2025/.

———. “Indonesia: Report Reveals Endemic Judicial Flaws in Death Penalty Cases.” Amnesty International, 2015. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/10/indonesia-report-reveals-endemic-judicial-flaws-in-death-penalty-cases/.

Kusumawati, Erna Dyah. “THE CHALLENGES OF IMPLEMENTING PROHIBITION OF TORTURE IN TWO LEVELS: ASEAN AND INDONESIA.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 2012. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v1i2.10634.

Lines, Rick. “A ‘Most Serious Crime’ ? - The Death Penalty for Drug Offences and International Human Rights Law.” Amicus Journal, no. 21 (2010): 21–28.

McRae, Dave. “Indonesian Capital Punishment in Comparative Perspective.” Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17301002.

Mehta, Pooja. “Death Penalty: Does It Fit within the Contours of CIL ?” Cambridge International Law Journal. Cambridge: Cambridge International Law Journal, 2019. https://cilj.co.uk/2019/11/17/death-penalty-does-it-fit-within-the-contours-of-cil/.

Minnesota, of University. “Concluding Observations on the Initial Report of Indonesia.” United Nations Human Rights Committee, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40sup-0536.

Nations, United. “Draft Conclusions on Identification and Legal Consequences of Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens), with Commentaries.” Yearbook of the International Law Comission II, no. 2 (2022): 1–6.

———. Human Rights Committee General comment No. 36, Article 6 § (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700094341.

———. MOVING AWAY FROM THE DEATH PENALTY: Arguments, Trends and Perspectives. Edited by Ivan Šimonovi´. 15th ed. New York, 2015.

Nations, United General Assembly. “Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty,” 2023.

Putra Abdi, Alfian. “ICJR: Penerapan Fair Trial Untuk Kasus Hukuman Mati Masih Minim.” Tirto.Id, 2019.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-undang RI nomor 12 tahun 2005 tentang pengesahan internasional kovenan hak sipil dan politik (2005).

Sabrina, Rau. “The Death Penalty for Drug Offences: What Do the International Drug Control Treaties Say about ‘Most Serious Crimes’?,” 2016. https://hrcessex.wordpress.com/2016/03/03/the-death-penalty-for-drug-offences-what-do-the-international-drug-control-treaties-say-about-most-serious-crimes/.

Sawyer, Geoffrey. “The Death Penalty Is Dead Wrong : Jus Cogens Norms and the Evolving Standard of Decency.” Pen State International Law Review 22, no. 3 (2004): 459–81.

Schabas, William. A. “The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law.” International Affairs 70, no. 1 (1994): 1-. https://doi.org/10.2307/2620755.

Sections 9, 277 Africa § (1995).

Susilowati, Tri, and Muhdar Muhdar. “PELAKSANAAN DAN PENEGAKKAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN DEMOKRASI DI INDONESIA” 5, no. 1 (2024): 76–84.

The, I N. No. 9346 1 (n.d.).

Tladi, Dire D. “Fourth Special Rapporteur Report on Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens).” UN Doc. A/CN.4/727 01508, no. January (2019).

Watch, Human Rights. “Malaysia Repeals Mandatory Death Penalty.” Malaysia, n.d. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/04/11/malaysia-repeals-mandatory-death-penalty.

Published
2025-05-17
How to Cite
Harmain, I., Dian Mustika Intan, Ilhamda Fattah Kaloko, Herry Wahyudi, & Irman. (2025). DISKREPANSI PRAKTIK HUKUMAN MATI DI INDONESIA TERHADAP STANDAR HAM INTERNASIONAL: ANALISIS REFORMASI KUHP 2023 DAN IMPLIKASINYA BAGI KEBIJAKAN PIDANA NASIONAL. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 20(1), 1 - 16. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v20i1.11360
Issue
Vol 20 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.